Is False Imprisonment a Felony in California? Penal Code 236 Explained
The short answer: false imprisonment under Penal Code section 236 is a misdemeanor in California unless the restraint was accomplished by violence, menace, fraud, or deceit, in which case Penal Code section 237 makes it a wobbler that the prosecutor can file as a felony. The charge shows up far more often than most people expect, usually alongside a domestic violence arrest in Riverside, San Bernardino, Victorville, or Los Angeles, because blocking a doorway, grabbing a car key, holding someone's arm during an argument, or refusing to let a partner leave a bedroom can all be charged as false imprisonment. This guide explains what the prosecutor must prove, what separates the misdemeanor from the felony, the defenses that work, and the collateral consequences that follow a conviction. For the broader picture, see our criminal defense practice page.
What is false imprisonment under Penal Code section 236?
The statutory definition is short. Penal Code section 236 defines false imprisonment as the unlawful violation of the personal liberty of another. Courts have read that language to mean any intentional, unlawful restraint, confinement, or detention that compels a person to stay somewhere or go somewhere against their will. No lock, rope, or room is required. A few seconds of restraint can be enough if the other elements are met.
It is not kidnapping. Kidnapping under Penal Code section 207 requires moving the person a substantial distance by force or fear and is always a felony. False imprisonment requires no movement at all. Prosecutors in San Bernardino County and Riverside County frequently charge false imprisonment as the lesser alternative when a kidnapping charge would not survive a preliminary hearing, and defense lawyers frequently argue for it as a lesser included offense at trial. It is also distinct from human trafficking under Penal Code section 236.1, which shares the section number but is a different crime with different elements.
Where the charge usually comes from. In our Inland Empire practice, the typical false imprisonment case is a domestic argument in Fontana, Moreno Valley, Hesperia, or Corona in which one partner tries to leave and the other blocks the door, takes the phone, or holds on to them. The deputies who respond are trained to look for a restraint, and the District Attorney often adds a Penal Code section 236 count to a complaint that already charges domestic battery under Penal Code section 243, subdivision (e)(1), or corporal injury under Penal Code section 273.5. Our guides on domestic battery under Penal Code section 243(e)(1) and corporal injury under Penal Code section 273.5 cover the companion charges.
What the prosecutor must prove for misdemeanor false imprisonment
The elements. To convict a defendant of misdemeanor false imprisonment, the prosecutor must prove beyond a reasonable doubt (1) that the defendant intentionally and unlawfully restrained, confined, or detained another person by compelling that person to stay or go somewhere, and (2) that the other person did not consent. The pattern instruction is CALCRIM 1242. The restraint can be accomplished by physical force, by words that the person reasonably believes will be backed up, or by any other means, but it must be intentional. An accidental or momentary blocking of a hallway is not false imprisonment.
Consent is the center of most cases. Consent given freely defeats the charge. Consent obtained by threats or by fraud does not. In a domestic case, the question is often whether the complaining witness actually tried to leave and was actually prevented, or whether the two people were simply arguing in the same room. Text messages sent during or after the incident frequently answer that question one way or the other, which is why we review them in every case. See our guide on whether police can use your text messages against you.
Unlawful means without legal authority. A store security guard who detains a suspected shoplifter for a reasonable time under the merchant's privilege in Penal Code section 490.5, a parent restraining a young child, or a citizen making a lawful arrest under Penal Code section 837 is not committing false imprisonment, as long as the detention stays within the scope of the authority.
When false imprisonment becomes a felony under Penal Code section 237
The four aggravators. Under Penal Code section 237, subdivision (a), false imprisonment effected by violence, menace, fraud, or deceit is punishable by imprisonment under Penal Code section 1170, subdivision (h), which means a felony sentence served in county jail rather than state prison. Because the statute allows the court to treat the offense as a misdemeanor instead, it is a wobbler. The pattern instruction for the felony version by violence or menace is CALCRIM 1240. For the felony, the prosecutor must prove the two misdemeanor elements plus (3) that the restraint was accomplished by violence or menace (or by fraud or deceit).
Violence means more force than the restraint itself. The Court of Appeal in People v. Fernandez (1994) 26 Cal.App.4th 710 explained that violence in this context means physical force greater than the force reasonably necessary to restrain the person. Holding someone's wrist so they cannot walk away is restraint; dragging them across the room, pinning them to the floor, or pushing them into a car is the additional force that turns the case into a felony.
Menace means a threat of harm. Menace is a verbal or physical threat of harm, including the use of a deadly weapon, that causes the person to stay. The threat can be express or implied. In People v. Matian (1995) 35 Cal.App.4th 480, the court held that grabbing a person and yelling at her, without a weapon or a threat of further harm, was not enough to prove menace, and it reduced the felony to a misdemeanor. In People v. Islas (2012) 210 Cal.App.4th 116, by contrast, the court found that menace could be implied from the defendants' conduct and the circumstances even without an express verbal threat. Whether the facts of a Riverside or Victorville case fall on the Matian side or the Islas side of that line is often the entire felony question.
Fraud or deceit. The felony also covers restraint accomplished by trickery, such as luring a person into a locked room or vehicle under false pretenses. These cases are less common in domestic matters and more common in cases involving minors, employment scams, or disputes between strangers.
Penalties for false imprisonment in California
Misdemeanor. Under Penal Code section 237, subdivision (a), misdemeanor false imprisonment is punishable by a fine, by up to one year in county jail, or by both, along with informal probation, which for most misdemeanors is now limited to one year under Penal Code section 1203a. Judges at the Riverside Hall of Justice and the San Bernardino Justice Center routinely impose probation with counseling rather than jail on a first-offense misdemeanor, but the sentence depends on the facts and the record.
Felony. Felony false imprisonment is punishable under Penal Code section 1170, subdivision (h), by a county jail term in the default felony range of sixteen months, two years, or three years set by Penal Code section 18, or by formal probation, which is generally limited to two years under Penal Code section 1203.1 unless an exception applies. Because the sentence is served in county jail rather than state prison and the offense is not on the serious or violent felony lists in Penal Code section 1192.7 or Penal Code section 667.5 by itself, a false imprisonment felony is not a strike unless a weapon or great bodily injury allegation is attached. Our guide on the difference between a misdemeanor and a felony explains how wobblers are classified.
Reducing the felony. A wobbler can be reduced to a misdemeanor by the court under Penal Code section 17, subdivision (b), at sentencing, at the preliminary hearing, or after probation is completed. Negotiating a misdemeanor plea or a 17(b) reduction is one of the most common outcomes in felony false imprisonment cases where the menace evidence is thin. See our guide on how to reduce a felony to a misdemeanor under Penal Code section 17(b).
The domestic violence crossover
Protective orders start at the first court date. When the complaining witness is a spouse, partner, former partner, co-parent, or other person described in Family Code section 6211, the court will issue a criminal protective order under Penal Code section 136.2 on form CR-160 at arraignment, often a full no-contact order that forces the defendant out of the family home in Rancho Cucamonga or Temecula. An emergency protective order may already be in place from the night of the arrest. Our guides on the criminal protective order under Penal Code section 136.2 and the emergency protective order after a domestic violence arrest explain how to seek a modification to a peaceful contact order.
The batterer program and firearms. A conviction for false imprisonment against a Family Code section 6211 person triggers the domestic violence probation terms of Penal Code section 1203.097, including a 52-week batterer intervention program, a minimum three-year probation term, and a protective order. Misdemeanor false imprisonment is listed in Penal Code section 29805, which imposes a ten-year California firearm prohibition, and a felony conviction triggers the lifetime ban under Penal Code section 29800. See our guides on the batterer intervention program and owning a gun after a domestic violence conviction.
Custody and the family court. A domestic violence finding, including a false imprisonment conviction against a co-parent, creates the rebuttable presumption against custody in Family Code section 3044. The same incident often produces a civil domestic violence restraining order request in family court. Our articles on how a domestic violence arrest affects child custody and our child custody practice page explain why the criminal and family cases must be handled together.
The complaining witness cannot drop the charge. Once the District Attorney files, the decision to proceed belongs to the prosecutor, not the complaining witness. Contacting the protected person to ask them to recant violates the protective order and can lead to a new charge under Penal Code section 136.1 for dissuading a witness. See our guides on whether the victim can drop domestic violence charges and dissuading a witness under Penal Code section 136.1.
Defenses to a false imprisonment charge
No restraint occurred. Many cases involve two people in the same room during a loud argument with no evidence that anyone was actually prevented from leaving. If the complaining witness walked out, called a friend, or stayed voluntarily, the first element fails. Body camera footage of the initial statements, the 911 call, and the layout of the home are the key evidence.
Consent. A person who agreed to stay, to get in the car, or to continue a conversation was not falsely imprisoned, even if they later regretted it. The timing of any withdrawal of consent matters, and the defense focuses on what was said and done at that moment.
No violence or menace for the felony. Even where a brief restraint is admitted, the felony often fails because there was no force beyond the restraint itself and no threat of harm. Under People v. Matian (1995) 35 Cal.App.4th 480, yelling and grabbing alone are not menace. Reducing a felony to a misdemeanor at the preliminary hearing stage is a realistic goal in many of these cases. Our guide on what actually happens at a preliminary hearing explains that opportunity.
Lawful authority or self-defense. A person who held someone briefly to stop an assault, to prevent a drunk partner from driving, or to protect a child acted lawfully if the restraint was reasonable and no greater than necessary. The same self-defense principles that apply to assault and battery under Penal Code sections 240 and 242 apply here.
False accusation. False imprisonment allegations arise in custody disputes, breakups, and immigration situations where one party has a motive to exaggerate. Prior inconsistent statements, text messages, and witness accounts are used to test credibility under Evidence Code section 780. Our guide on being falsely accused of domestic violence explains how to preserve evidence early, and our article on what makes a criminal case weak describes the problems prosecutors look for before filing.
Suppression and statements. If the arrest followed an unlawful entry into the home or an improperly obtained statement, a motion under Penal Code section 1538.5 may exclude the evidence. Prosecutors in domestic violence cases can also offer evidence of prior incidents under Evidence Code section 1109, so a defense plan must account for the client's history. Our guide on what not to say to police explains why statements at the scene are often the most damaging evidence in these cases.
How a false imprisonment case moves through Inland Empire and Los Angeles courts
Charging. The arresting agency sends the report to the District Attorney, who decides whether to file a misdemeanor, a felony, or nothing, and whether to add false imprisonment to the domestic violence counts. Our article on what prosecutors look at before filing charges explains that review. Cases from Riverside, Moreno Valley, and Perris go to the Riverside Hall of Justice; cases from San Bernardino, Fontana, and Redlands go to the San Bernardino Justice Center; cases from Victorville, Hesperia, Apple Valley, and Adelanto go to the Victorville courthouse; and cases from Los Angeles go to the Clara Shortridge Foltz Criminal Justice Center or a regional courthouse such as Pasadena, Pomona, or Long Beach. Orange County cases from Santa Ana and Anaheim are heard at the Central Justice Center. Check the court's current website for assignments.
Resolution options. A misdemeanor false imprisonment charge that does not involve a Family Code section 6211 victim may be eligible for misdemeanor diversion under Penal Code section 1001.95, and a defendant with a qualifying mental health diagnosis may qualify for mental health diversion under Penal Code section 1001.36 in either a misdemeanor or felony case. Plea negotiations often focus on reducing the felony to a misdemeanor, substituting a non-domestic-violence charge such as disturbing the peace, or dismissing the false imprisonment count in exchange for a plea on another count. Our guides on misdemeanor diversion, mental health diversion, and whether to take a plea deal explain the choices.
After the case. A misdemeanor conviction can generally be dismissed after probation under Penal Code section 1203.4 using form CR-180, and a felony reduced under Penal Code section 17(b) can be dismissed the same way. The firearm prohibition and the family court findings survive the dismissal. See our guide on how to expunge a criminal record in California. Immigration consequences are a separate concern, because a felony false imprisonment conviction with a sentence of one year or more may be treated as an aggravated felony and a domestic violence false imprisonment conviction may be treated as a crime of domestic violence under federal law; non-citizen clients must have the plea reviewed under Penal Code section 1016.3 before entering it.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is false imprisonment a felony or a misdemeanor in California?
It can be either. Under Penal Code section 237, false imprisonment is a misdemeanor unless it was accomplished by violence, menace, fraud, or deceit, in which case it is a wobbler that the prosecutor can file as a felony punishable under Penal Code section 1170, subdivision (h). The court can reduce a felony to a misdemeanor under Penal Code section 17(b).
Can I be charged with false imprisonment for blocking a door during an argument?
Yes, if the other person was actually prevented from leaving. Standing in a doorway so a partner cannot walk out is the most common fact pattern in Inland Empire false imprisonment cases, and it is usually charged as a misdemeanor under Penal Code section 236 alongside a domestic violence count. Whether it becomes a felony depends on whether force beyond the blocking or a threat of harm was used, as explained in People v. Matian (1995) 35 Cal.App.4th 480.
Is false imprisonment a domestic violence crime?
It is when the alleged victim is a partner, spouse, co-parent, or similar person. A false imprisonment conviction against a person described in Family Code section 6211 carries the domestic violence probation terms of Penal Code section 1203.097, a criminal protective order under Penal Code section 136.2, and the custody presumption in Family Code section 3044.
Does a false imprisonment conviction take away my gun rights?
Yes. Misdemeanor false imprisonment under Penal Code section 236 is one of the offenses listed in Penal Code section 29805, which imposes a ten-year California firearm prohibition. A felony conviction triggers the lifetime prohibition under Penal Code section 29800, and a domestic violence conviction can also trigger the federal prohibition.
What is the difference between false imprisonment and kidnapping?
Movement. Kidnapping under Penal Code section 207 requires moving the victim a substantial distance by force or fear, and it is a straight felony with a state prison range. False imprisonment under Penal Code section 236 requires only an unlawful restraint with no movement, and it is a misdemeanor or a wobbler. False imprisonment is a lesser included offense of kidnapping.
Can false imprisonment be expunged in California?
Generally yes, after probation is completed. A misdemeanor conviction, or a felony reduced to a misdemeanor under Penal Code section 17(b), can be dismissed under Penal Code section 1203.4 by petition on form CR-180. The dismissal does not restore firearm rights, does not erase the family court finding, and must be disclosed in some licensing and government employment applications.
Gramling Law Group defends false imprisonment and domestic violence charges at the Riverside Hall of Justice, the Southwest Justice Center in Murrieta, the San Bernardino Justice Center, the Victorville courthouse, the Clara Shortridge Foltz Criminal Justice Center, the Central Justice Center in Santa Ana, and criminal courts throughout the Inland Empire, Los Angeles County, Orange County, and Southern California. Daniel Gramling, Esq. offers flat-fee criminal defense and limited-scope options and handles the related restraining order and custody matters in family court. Call (909) 654-4575 or contact us through this website for a consultation.
This article is educational and is not legal advice. Reading it does not create an attorney-client relationship. It addresses California law only.
Related Guides From Gramling Law Group
Learn more about our criminal defense serving the Inland Empire, Los Angeles County, and Southern California.
We defend false imprisonment and domestic violence charges in Riverside, San Bernardino, and Victorville, and across the Inland Empire. If a restraining order was filed with the criminal case, see our domestic violence restraining order defense page.
Gramling Law Group
3600 Lime St, Bldg 2, Riverside, CA 92501
Phone: (909) 654-4575
Serving the Inland Empire, Los Angeles County, Orange County, and all of Southern California except San Diego in family law and criminal defense.
Follow Daniel Gramling on Instagram: @californiafamilylawyer
Comments